iCloud - MobileMe Not.

Back in 2008, Steve’s software guys had dropped the ball on Apple’s cloud storage service. MobileMe was supposed to allow people to upload their email, contacts, calendars, bookmarks, pics and video to the internet ether so it could be plucked from the cloud and synced with all their devices. It failed with flying colours.
For US$100/year, Steve’s customers paid for the joy of losing their emails for days on end, or losing them entirely to MobileMe’s black hole. This mistake was not just another amusing train-wreck like the G4 Cube, MobileMe was actually ruining people’s daily digital lives. At the very least, it exposed how people were willing to trust their lifestyles to Apple. Two of Steve’s most influential pet journos, Walt Mossberg[1] of Wall Street Journal and David Pogue[2] of New York Times, each broke from their dog-collars and served up a steaming bowl of vitriol to MobileMe on the same day.
"Mossberg, our friend, is no longer writing good things about us," intoned Steve to the gathering of crestfallen employees at his Cupertino ‘Town Hall’. "You've tarnished Apple's reputation. You should hate each other for having let each other down."[3] Where did that curious line come from – “You should hate each other”? Did Steve want his workers to join in on his self-loathing?
The ass-kissing began with a free month of storage for disgruntled customers – and there were many of them. Nothing changed. MobileMe maintained its MobileMess and customers continued to send irate mail to every publication – on and offline. By August, Steve was offering three months free subscription.
Then Dropbox entered the cloud storage market. They offered the same price for twice the space, none of the glitches, and a two gigabyte ‘freemium’ for tightwads who don’t want to pay anything. Dropbox is available on both iPhone and Android. The unholy cross-platform marriage of Dropbox was considered the better option for those wanting to dump their stuff in the cloud. Google stepped into the ring a few months later with their own calendar/contacts sync service. It paired with their Gmail storage service which had been around a few years more than MobileMe. Google offers a seven-gigabyte freemium in exchange for perhaps monetizing your personal information. Is that a small sacrifice? Even The Unofficial Apple Website asked the question – what’s the point of MobileMe?[4]
ArsTechnica.com’s ‘Infinite Loop’ section exposed an internal email from Steve to his employees regarding the MobileMe cockup.
Team,

The launch of MobileMe was not our finest hour.  There are several things we could have done better:

– MobileMe was simply not up to Apple's standards – it clearly needed more time and testing.

– Rather than launch MobileMe as a monolithic service, we could have launched over-the-air syncing with iPhone to begin with, followed by the web applications one by one – Mail first, followed 30 days later (if things went well with Mail) by Calendar, then 30 days later by Contacts.

– It was a mistake to launch MobileMe at the same time as iPhone 3G, iPhone 2.0 software and the App Store.  We all had more than enough to do, and MobileMe could have been delayed without consequence.

We are taking many steps to learn from this experience so that we can grow MobileMe into a service that our customers will love.  One step that I can share with you today is that the MobileMe team will now report to Eddy Cue, who will lead all of our internet services – iTunes, the App Store and, starting today, MobileMe.  Eddy's new title will be Vice President, Internet Services and he will now report directly to me.

The MobileMe launch clearly demonstrates that we have more to learn about Internet services.  And learn we will.  The vision of MobileMe is both exciting and ambitious, and we will press on to make it a service we are all proud of by the end of this year.

Steve.[5]
That never happened. For the next three years, the cloud became more important to the end-user who had begun to buy anorexic tablets stingy on storage space. MobileMe remained a much-maligned mess. Many wondered if perhaps Apple should give up on software and stick to what they know best - making pretty objects.
Steve embarked upon a mission to redeem himself. He needed to launch a program without the distraction of shiny hardware launches. He would do this at the risk of disappointing fan-boys who, since they habitually molest their iPad/Phones, only seem to love new Apple products they can fondle.
As the dawn broke on June 6th, 2011, a crowd 5,200+ developers and media choked the Moscone Center at Apple’s WorldWide Developer’s Conference. A thousand of them wouldn’t fit into the 4000 seat hall. Apple tradition, of course, is to oversell and undersupply. Each punter had paid US$1600 a ticket to see what’s next. The event had sold out in ten hours. The worst kept secret in Silicon Valley was that Steve was going to do some cloud busting.
Fortune Magazine writer and fellow Steve-Watcher, Phillip Elmer-Hewitt, reported on the scene,
Holding pride of place at the head of the line is a portly developer who says he got there at 1:30 a.m., eight and a half hours early. He has bad knees, he explains, and might not make it to the hall at all if he doestn't get a good head start.[6]

 
For those waiting in the foyer, the overhead speakers played, "Hey, You, Get Offa My Cloud" by The Stones, and "[I've Looked At Clouds from] Both Sides Now" by Joni Mitchell. Young Guardian journo Jemima Kiss begged, “Something more recent (please)?” [7]
Steve took to the stage and received the usual standing ovation as every live blogger tapped furiously on their devices detailing that Steve was “looking disturbingly gaunt, while the audience shouts ‘we love you’.” He wore a roomy black jumper this time, sans the turtleneck. His faded jeans seem to be getting looser on his hips with each new presentation.  His sleeves kept falling over his thin forearms, and he habitually pulled them back up again.

Rebel tech blogger, Gizmodo were barred from these Apple events since “The lost iPhone prototype” (read the whole story in a previous post on this blog). Guardian journos at the event reported that Gizmodo were caught live blogging onsite and Steve’s heavies escorted them to the “naughty step”.[8]


Steve was only there to talk about his baby in the cloud. He let his other lackeys chat about the lesser stuff. Steve’s money-quote had a biblical ring to it: “Some people think the cloud is just a hard disk in the sky (the crowd laughs)… We think it's way more than that and we call it iCloud”
“Now… you might ask, ‘why should I believe them? They’re the ones who brought me MobileMe” There was an explosion of laughter, which felt more like an emotional release of end-user frustration. He then repeated what he said in that staff email from three years ago. “It wasn’t our finest hour.”
Apple is the last of the major tech companies to enter the cloud market with earnest. This allowed Steve to watch the other players show their hand before he crafted a more tasty product. One could only imagine Steve’s inner monologue:  

“These pricks with their Androids want everything free, eh? I’ll give them free. I’ll give everything for free. But there’s another price: Everything you own must be made by me.”


Steve’s five-Gig free cloud locker stores everything: Contacts, calendar, mail, apps, data, books, documents, (bookmarks, settings?) photos, music, and video. A file change on one gadget is automatically reflected on your other gadgets - so long as that gadget is made by Apple, or it’s a PC loaded with iTunes.

“Keeping these devices in sync is driving us crazy” When the audience cheers, he takes the opportunity to cough discreetly. Thank you, Steve. He must be watching this author and his girlfriend argue over who wants to tackle the simple task dragging photos from a PC to an iPad. This is normally a simple job for an Android/PC jockey; but a royal pain for those who decided to take the “switch of faith”. 

However, what if you don’t want automatic synchronicity of every move you make, and every breath you take (apologies, Sting)? Will there be a yes/no dialogue box before each individual sync? What if you are nervous about Steve having everything of yours in his cloud?

Songs are the most interesting issue in the iCloud proposition. Music not purchased via iTunes must be synced via iTunes Match for US$25 a-year. Steve enjoyed pointing out that his price is half the price of Amazon’s similar service. Nevertheless, it could be argued that you are paying to access songs you’ve already purchased, just for the convenience of not using your own drive space. However, that is not a problem for those who haven’t paid a dime for the music on their hard drives. All of their low-quality pirated songs will be recognized by iTunes Match and laundered into a lossless legal copies from the iTunes library - that’s’ twenty-five bucks well spent. Thanks again, Steve.

On the other hand, what if you’re into Dollshead? What if you enjoy listening to Closed On Account Of Rabies – the poems of Edgar Alan Poe? Neither of those are in the iTunes library. It seems that Steve’s eighteen million tracks may not be nearly enough to iMatch everything.

To set up the music end of iCloud, Steve sealed a deal with the big four record labels for the second time since iTunes. This is the ace card his rivals in the cloud DON’T hold in their sweaty hands. Once again, the Big Four find themselves at Steve’s door, hats in their hands, needing Steve’s help to rescue their floundering business - but they weren’t doing it free. Steve paid them US$100-150 million each. Steve gets his usual 30% cut.[9]

“If you don’t think we’re serious about this, you’re wrong,” Steve intones with gravitas. He is immediately dwarfed on stage by a gigantic image of his latest one billion-dollar, half-million square, data warehouse.[10] The humming digital database in the desert looks like the foreboding corridors of The Death Star. One begins to suspect that this dog and pony show is just a taste of what he has planned. Steve doesn’t want us to let the cloud, nor his iCloud, be the centre of our digital lives. He wants Apple to be our centre. His mission is to pull us like a tractor beam from the Microsoft orbit. Microsoft beat Apple in the PC war, so Steve’s payback is to kill the PC.


“The PC will be the most visible casualty of the cloud revolution,” stated a former engineer, Steve Perlman. “Apple knows it.” The 25 million iPads sold so far have eaten away at PC sales. Both Microsoft and Hewlett-Packard disappointed investors with their earnings last quarter.[11]

The cloud idea was brought up fifteen years ago by Steve’s best friend, Larry Ellison who runs Oracle, who incidentally make cloud servers. He touched upon the subject in the documentary, Trumph of The Nerds, while Steve was still chasing his tail with the NeXT Cube. The doco’s script said, 

Larry believes the PC will be replaced with a cheap device he calls an information appliance. It will be a glorified television which will access information and computing simply by connecting to giant computers via the Internet. Just like turning on a tap - and the PC will go the way of the well and the bucket.

Larry Ellison: ”I hate the PC with a passion. Me going down to the store and buying Windows 95, I've got to get into my car drive down to a store buy a cardboard box full of bits you know encoded on a piece of plastic CDROM and you bring it home and read a manual install this thing - you must be kidding you know, put the stuff on the net - it's bits, don't put bits in cardboard, cardboard in trucks, trucks to stores, me go to the store, you know, pick the stuff out, it's insane. OK I love the Internet - I want information you know it flows across the wire.”

So who supplied the servers to apple’s server farm? Was it Larry?

As usual, the most clever readers’ commentary came from The Guardian:

“Now that there has been an admission that it sucks, can I please have my MobileMe subscriptions back?”

“Can't be having anything with the cloud - I am sorry to say. Until these services are reliably running for some years, have a history of no hacking, aren't going to have the FBI knocking on my door asking about my blueprints for mass mind control ... my stuff stays on my laptop.”

“I live in Africa - a 4GB download will take about a month on my present dodgy connection and cost about 200 quid in airtime alone assuming the connection stays up for that long and does not have to be restarted.”

“All that automatic uploading and downloading seems to assume all you can eat data accounts which seem to be disappearing.”

“Only snag I can see with this service is that you have use that steaming pile of monkey shit (iTunes) to use it.”

“Hey nerds - cheer the truck up. Who cares? We all know you'll buy it anyway despite moaning about it!”

“It isn't an Apple announcement until there's an oleaginous quote from Stephen Fry attached.”

“is it just me, or is the bite out of the Apple logo behind Steves head getting bigger?”

[1] Mossberg, W. (2008, July 24) Apple's MobileMe Is Far Too Flawed To Be Reliable. Wall Street Journal.

[2] Pogue, D. (2008, July 24) Apple’s MobileMess [blog]. Pogue’s Posts. From New York Times. Retrieved from : http://pogue.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/07/24/apples-mobilemess/

[3]Lashinsky , A. (2011, May 23) How Apple works: Inside the world's biggest startup. Fortune Magazine.

[4] Hirsch, L. (2010, June 15) Enter Gmail syncing and Dropbox; Exit MobileMe? From tuaw.com. Retrieved from: http://www.tuaw.com/2010/06/15/enter-gmail-contact-syncing-and-dropbox-exit-mobileme/

[5] Cheng, J. (2008, August 5) Steve Jobs on MobileMe: the full e-mail.arstechnica.com.


[6] Elmer-DeWitt, P. (2011, June 6) Live from San Francisco: Steve Jobs unveils the iCloud [Blog]. From Apple 2.0. In money.cnn.com. Retrieved from: http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/06/06/live-from-san-fancisco-steve-jobs-unveils-the-icloud/#comments

[7] Arthur, C. & Kiss, Jemima (2011, June 6) WWDC 2011: Steve Jobs on iCloud, iOS5, Lion – live [blog]. Technology Blog. From The Guardian. Retrieved from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2011/jun/06/apple-wwdc-liveblog-steve-jobs-icloud  

[8][8] Arthur, C. & Kiss, Jemima (2011, June 6) WWDC 2011: Steve Jobs on iCloud, iOS5, Lion – live [blog]. Technology Blog. From The Guardian. Retrieved from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2011/jun/06/apple-wwdc-liveblog-steve-jobs-icloud  

[9] Sandoval, G. & Sowensohn, J (2011, June 3) Apple signs Universal Music to iCloud? Rom zdnet.com.au. Retrieved from: http://www.zdnet.com.au/apple-signs-universal-music-to-icloud_print-339316168.htm

[10] Arthur, C. (2011, June 5) Apple pins its hopes on the iCloud as users drift away from computers. From The Guardian.

[11] Satariano, A. & Burrows, P. (2011, June 8) Steve Jobs Uses ICloud to Pick Apart Industry He Helped Form. Bloomberg. Retrieved from: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-06-07/apple-s-jobs-using-icloud-to-dismantle-the-pc-industry-he-helped-build.html

Steve Jobs vets his life story

Classy author, Walter Isaacson, is putting the finishing flourish on Steve’s first authorised biography. There were whispers of this book in The New York Times as early as February, 2010. [1] Within ten days, The Huffington Post ran a competition inviting entrants to design the cover. One reader suggested that the book’s title be iSaySo. [2] The publisher, Simon and Schuster, decided upon iSteve – close enough. 

Forbes said that iSteve, “was a remarkably tasteless title…If, as they say, there’s a fine line between stupid and clever, that title was getting very close to it.” [3] The rich man’s magazine may have a point. How did Simon & Schuster's publicity department miss that Steve Wozniak's 2007 bio was similarly entitled iWoz? Nevertheless, iSteve climbed to Amazon's top 50 best-seller list before it was even finished.

Walter, his wife, and his daughter felt the title was “too cutesy”. The author pushed his publisher to rename it simply “Steve Jobs”.  [4] The new title is commonly described as more elegant - using one of Steve’s favourite Jobsian adjectives.

Cnet claimed the original title was a lazy. [5] It could be argued that the safer revision was even lazier. Anyway, Cnet’s critique was surprisingly courageous considering Simon & Schuster is a unit of CBS, whose “Interactive unit” publishes Cnet.

Huffington Post is taking a poll as which title is best. Currently 60/40 in favour of new title, Steve Jobs. [6]  “You had me at Steve”, swooned one doe-eyed Apple Insider commentator. [7]

The difference between authorised and un-authori­zed is often just a different flavour of embellishment. Steve has never been happy with the un-authorised bios. One month before John Wiley & Sons released their un-authorised biography, iCon, all the publisher's books were pulled from the shelves of Apple stores. John Wiley probably had two reactions: Big friggin' deal - no one goes to an Apple store to buy a book anyway; and thanks for the free publicity, Steve. The book’s co-author, Jeffery Young was less than casual about Steve's tantrum. ''This guy is out of control. I'm just a little guy. I'm just one of many guys Steve has destroyed over the years." [8]

Author Leander Kahney took out a million dollar defamation insurance policy just in case Steve didn't like his biography, Inside Steve’s Brain. [9] Considering Steve’s reputation, you can understand why Leander covered his ass.  

There’s no doubt Steve will vet every word of iSteve (and possibly trademark anything he can get legally get away with). The hagiography is bound to be a beautifully-crafted iYawn

Steve has previously demonstrated, not only his desire to rewrite his own history, but also rewrite the history The United States of America so that it can dovetail nicely with his own view of himself. One of the coolest myths about Steve is the idea that he was a child of the sixties zeitgeist. Unfortunately for him, he actually grew up in the tacky seventies - a fact that can't be refuted no matter how many Bob Dylan albums he owns. Nonetheless, in an interview in the documentary, Triumph of The Nerds, Steve never lets an irksome fact get in the way of a good story:
 
"Remember that the Sixties happened in the early seventies, right, so you have to remember that and that's sort of when I came of age. So I saw a lot of this and to me the spark of that was that there was something beyond sort of what you see every day. It's the same thing that causes people to want to be poets instead of bankers. And I think that's a wonderful thing. And I think that that same spirit can be put into products, and those products can be manufactured and given to people and they can sense that spirit."

"The sixties happened in the early seventies"? Really, Steve? I wonder if your biographer will agree with your reinvention?

Who is the man Steve trusts with his legacy? Walter is a Harvard Man and a Rhodes Scholar. He once ran TIME Magazine and CNN. He’s been honoured with diplomatic appointments by both George.W. [10] and Hillary Clinton [11]. Obama has asked him to chair the Broadcasting Board of Governors.[12] The company-man plays by the rules and never paints outside the numbers. Whereas Steve is the original entrepreneur who doesn’t care what you or I think.  Both men have only one thing in common: neither has changed their company website photo since the '90s.

Walter has already written biographies about Kissinger, Ben Franklin, and Steve's hero, Einstein. The opening lines of Wally’s bestselling biography of Franklin demonstrates that Steve’s story is something he has visited before:


His arrival in Philadelphia is one of the most famous scenes in autobiographical literature: the bedraggled 17-year-old runaway, cheeky, yet with a pretence of humility straggling off the boat and buying three puffy rolls as he wanders up Market Street. [13]

Perhaps iSteve will be Memoir 1.0. It may be more prudent to wait another six months for Memoir 2.0 - thinner and lighter.



[1] Stone, B. (2010, February 15) Jobs Is Said to Assist With Book on His Life. New York Times.

[2] Bosker, B. (2010, February 25) Steve Jobs’ Biography: Design the Cover of Steve Jobs’ Book [Blog]. Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/25/steve-jobs-biography-desi_n_473864.html

[3]Caulfield, B. (2011, July 5) Truly Terrible Title Of Authorized Steve Jobs Biography Changed [blog]. From Shiny Objects. Forbes.com. Retrieved from: http://blogs.forbes.com/briancaulfield/2011/07/05/truly-terrible-title-of-authorized-steve-jobs-biography-changed/

[4]Elmer-DeWitt, P. (2011, July 5) Steve Jobs' bio gets a new title [blog]. From Apple 2.0. Retrieved from: http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/07/05/steve-jobs-bio-gets-a-new-title/

[5]  Westaway, L. (2011, July 6) Steve Jobs' biography renamed from iSteve to something less cheesy [blog]. From Crave at  Cnet.com. Retrieved from: http://crave.cnet.co.uk/gadgets/steve-jobs-biography-renamed-from-isteve-to-something-less-cheesy-50004328/

[6] Huffington Post (2011, June 6) Steve Jobs Biography Renamed: 'iSteve' Becomes 'Steve Jobs . Retrieved from: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/06/steve-jobs-biography-title_n_891194.html?view=print

[7] Apple Insider (2011, July 7) Authorized Steve Jobs biography gets 'more elegant' title. Retrieved from: http://forums.appleinsider.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=127665

[8] Hafner, K. (2005, April 30) Steve Jobs's Review of His Biography: Ban It. New York Times.

[9] Kearney, L. (2010, Februray 15) Steve Jobs Is Collaborating On Authorized Biography — Report. Retrieved from: http://www.cultofmac.com/steve-jobs-is-collaborating-on-an-authorized-biography-report/30460

[10] Elmer-DeWitt, P. (2011, April 10) The man who won Steve Jobs' trust [blog]. From Apple 2.0. CNNMoney. Retrieved from: http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/04/10/the-man-who-won-steve-jobs-trust-2/

[11] U.S Department of State (2010, April 27) Closing Remarks at the Presidential Summit on Entrepreneurship. Retrieved from: http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2010/04/140968.htm

[12] Whitehouse Press Release. (2009, November 11) President Obama Announces More Key Administration Posts.

[13] Isaacson, W. (2004) Benjamin Franklin: An American Life. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Big Steve Jobs is Watching You?

At the 2011 Where 2.0 conference, two geeks found something most iPad users couldn’t be bothered looking for – a tracking device.

One of the guys was Alasdair Allan. He spends his time watching the skies as a senior research fellow in astronomy at University of Exeter. His buddy, Pete Warden, may know what he’s talking about considering he was an Apple engineer for five years. There is a YouTube clip of the two lads chillaxin’ and chewing the fat about how Pete’s old boss is mysteriously collecting data on his customers using a “hidden file”, anonymously entitled consolidated.db. As they sat around a shared Macbook, they explained how the little file stores all location data of iPhone/Pad users since the iOS 4 upgrade in June 2010.[1] The conversation sounded like a couple of Trekkies who had found a continuity mistake in episode 12, season 4. Keep watching the skies, gentlemen.

The big reveal was followed by seven days of Apple silence on the matter. During that week, everyone but the Canadian Mounties was on Steve’s ass about this little file. Europeans were particularly interested: CNIL - the French data protection authority; The Italian Data Protection Authority; and The Bavarian Agency for the Supervision of Data Protection in Germany. Europe is a part of the world that still fights the good fight for privacy. In the States, two Democrats sent letters asking Steve to "please explain" [2] (One of the politicians was an ex-Saturday Night Live comedian).

Only a week before consolidated.db was exposed, Sony gave away the personal data, and probably credit cards, of 100 million+ customers. Meanwhile, the U.S Government continues to spy on the keywords used by its citizens in the ex cathedra name of national security. Even grocery store club cards collect data on what we buy. These are only the few intrusions we know about. The idea that any device belongs entirely to the owner was lost when internet cookies began slipping into the back rooms of our PCs during the ‘90s.

The fictional spy, Jason Bourne, is a popular hero because he eludes the surveillance that most of us have grown to tolerate. Jason dodges CCTV cams by losing himself in the crowd. He ducks in and out of anonymous internet cafes. He places calls using only a quaint old pay phone or a prepaid cell-phone bought with cash. 

Unless we're prepared to live like a black ops agent, it's difficult to be so connected without losing a piece of yourself. There's very real reason why the celluloid spy plucks out his sim card and crushes it under his boot-heel. It’s the same reason Osama Bin Laden’s compound allowed no mobile or internet connections (although U.S special ops found him anyway).

Steve is an easy target for tinfoil-hat-wearing conspiracy theorists because he was the one who made such a big deal about fighting Big Brother back in 1984. However, our surveillance culture is not exactly what George Orwell envisioned. Our Big Brother didn’t happen to us. We let it happen to us. There is a palpable itchy feeling as we blindly click though without reading user-agreements the size of the Magna Carta (the Latin version, and just as convoluted). No time to read the fine print, we just want the thing to run, and run now.

Admittedly, there are proven benefits that our every move is stored on a drive somewhere, out there. It comes in handy when tracking your kid’s location when they should be in class, or finding the nearest Starbucks. This may outweigh the little annoyances like Starbucks offering you a discount every week, or The Terminator locating Sarah Connor. 

On the same day that President Obama was bullied into proving he was born on U.S soil, Steve took to the stage to prove he wasn’t Big Brother. Both men looked like they had better things to do. Steve said the iOS 4 upgrade cached location data to turbocharge telephony connections. This sounds reasonable enough after Judas phone copped so much flack for losing reception. Unfortunately, the cache was not programmed to purge after binging. This is a common coding error. How many of us regularly purge our email accounts of the dregs we don’t need anymore? Steve said he would reduce the location cache on the iOS to no more than a week, and delete the cache entirely when users turned off location services. Done and done.

The amusing money-quote was, “It took us about a week to do an investigation and write a response, which is fairly quick for something this technically complicated.”  A week seems like a long time to investigate a seemingly simple issue. The real explanation may have been this: his people took five minutes to trace the “hidden file” and then it took the rest of the week to explain it to Steve. This is a man who likes things simple. He won’t sign agreement with IBM more than a page long, and he didn’t want a mouse or CD burner software with more than one button. 

The New York Times readers’ commentary on the subject was flame-fest between Apple haters and fan-boys. The most telling comments were:

"Track me all you want! I'm so boring my triangulation data would put most to sleep. When's iPad 3 coming out?"  

 "But, Steve Jobs majored in liberal arts! I expected better."

"Remember that you can not post on this thread without at least three organizations knowing your approximate location." [3]

[1] O’Reilly (2011, April 20) iPhone Tracking Discussion [video clip]. Retrieved from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GynEFV4hsA0

[2] Helft, M. & O’Brien, K. (2011, April 21) Inquiries Grow Over Apple’s Data Collection Practices. The New York Times.

[3] Helft, M. (2011, April 27) Jobs Says Apple Made Mistakes With iPhone Data. New York Times. Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/28/technology/28apple.html

The music industry falls in love with the iPad

Steve may struggle with social media, but he has the Midas touch for a medium much older than Facebook – music. The epicentre of blind Apple-fanboy faith is the popular music industry. Woe betide the poor sod who dares wander back-stage with a common Dell laptop. It was inevitable that Apple-toting/hugging musos would try to reinvent the iPad as the tool of a new generation of musicians. Guitar tab and tuner apps are popular purchases. The most expensive app is Studiotrack for a paltry $40-50. The multi-track song-writing tool is an affordable alternative to hundreds of dollars-worth of home studio product. Engadget reported that Studiotrack shatters the “creativity on rails” paradigm that irked iPad users in the past.[1] Pretty apps are no replacement for the real deal yet. Nevertheless, musos love the messy DIY feel of tapping out tracks on their own wafer-thin tablet in the back of the tour bus - especially because their toy has a picture of a fruit on the back. Steve would be proud.
Musician Damon Albarn, of Blur and Gorillaz, declared, "I hope I'll be making the first record on an iPad... I fell in love with my iPad as soon as I got it, so I've made a completely different kind of record.”[2] Damon explained the sophistication of his artist’s journey after using Korg’s iPad app:
I was just trying things out with the iELECTRIBE...pushing the buttons up and down and humming over the top…I sat on my phone at one point and it started interfering...the signal started clicking…so I looped that up and made a rhythm…and then hummed over that…then did some clapping on it..and ..yeah …Uhmm, so…I..did it on an iPad using all the music apps. I might do another one in a bit…[3]
The idea makes lovely press, so long as you play down the fact that the technology isn’t there yet. The album's final mix was crafted at the eighty year-old Abbey Road Studios. Damon’s very rough-cut of The Fall was rounded off on a twelve-core Powermac desktop light years faster than the iPad.
Korg was so impressed with Damon’s plug that the company released a Gorillaz special edition of the iElectribe app. Despite its wonderful signature skin, all three written reviews were not good. Here’s one:
We have to obtain copyright clearance to publish? Korg, you can't be serious! Real nice trick putting that info at the very bottom of the info page. Going to Apple and U.S. Consumer Protection with this one. Deceptive representation of the product, unprofessional - possibly illegal.[4]
Since The Fall, Steve finally upgraded his iPad’s OS to allow multi-tasking. No one really knows what took him so long to make such a fundamental change. Musos are now able to use a plethora of apps without busting a vein trying to juggle tools. Nevertheless, until Steve includes more than one lonely data jack in his anorexic device, the iPad’s potential to make sweet music will be hamstrung by his minimalist obsession.

[1]Miller, P. (2010, April 7) iPad apps: creativity unleashed. Engadget.com. Retrieved from:
[2] NME (2010, November 12) Damon Albarn records new Gorillaz album on an iPad.

[3] Korg.com. Retrieved from: http://korg.com/iElectribeGorillaz

Steve Jobs Versus Mark Zuckerberg

Facebook founder, Mark Zuckerberg has no social skills, but he created the world's most popular social network. He was born the same year that Steve hurled his Macintosh against his Big Brother, IBM. Twenty-six years later, Mark’s empty eyes stare at us from cover of Time Magazine with the headline, “Person of The Year”. The public voted for Mac-toting troublemaker, Julian Assange to receive the award. In fact, he received twenty times more votes than Mark. However, the news icon decided Mark was a safer option to connect with the Time brand name. The nut-shelled reason that Mark is on the December cover is that he has connected one-twelfth of the world’s population. Time explains itself:
Facebook makes cyberspace more like the real world: dull but civilized. The masked-ball period of the Internet is ending. Where people led double lives, real and virtual, now they lead single ones again. The fact that people yearned not to be liberated from their daily lives but to be more deeply embedded in them is an extraordinary insight, as basic and era-defining in its way as Jobs' realization that people prefer a graphical desktop to a command line or pretty computers to boring beige ones.[1]

Steve blew his chance of winning this accolade in 1982. Does Steve really need the award anyway? Consider some of its previous recipients: Stalin (twice), Mao, Nixon, and George W Bush.

Hollywood has made a scathing and critically acclaimed film about Mark called The Social Network. Like Pirates of Silicon Valley, it details the mercenary tactics behind building a digital empire. The film was released on the heels of a hot trend of people leaving Facebook. Information Week[2] reported that Peter Rojas, founder of Gizmodo and Engadget, and Google guru, Matt Cutts have turned off their Facebook pages in protest against the enfant terrible who built it. Mark is making influential enemies, but his worst enemy is himself. He Shanghaied ConnectU and then joked about it, “They made a mistake ha, ha. They asked me to make it for them. So I’m like delaying it so it won’t be ready until after the Facebook thing comes out”. He hacked Harvard reporters’ accounts to stop an investigation about him.[3] He stole the check-in feature from Foursquare. He stole public facing profiles from Twitter. Then he changed his customers’ privacy settings three times.


Mark’s office is a twenty-minute drive from Steve’s. The Apple CEO was generous enough to be the first to sponsor Mark through his Apple Students Group.[4] Steve also featured Facebook pages in his iPad commercials. In June 2010, the un-grateful start-up up-start scrawled on his Facebook page, “This week I got an iPhone. This weekend I got four chargers so I can keep it charged everywhere I go and a land line so I can actually make calls." Later, he replaced the iPhone with an Android.[5]


In September, Forbes Magazine announced that Mark is richer than Steve.[6] Regardless of Mark's rank in a rich man's magazine, Steve reigns supreme as the entrepreneur teenagers most admire. This is Mark’s most important demographic, and his greatest loss if he wants their support. The 2010 Junior Achievement Teens and Entrepreneurship survey placed Steve as number one favorite. Mark was down the list at number six, behind Oprah. A look at the questions reveals why this Steve was numero uno. Thirty-one percent admired entrepreneurs who “make a difference in people’s lives”. Wealth and fame earned only ten percent of their vote. Twenty-four percent said, “Controlling your destiny” was the key motivation to become an entrepreneur like Steve.[7]


Just like Steve, Mark travelled from place to place in India on a “vision quest” for a month of “pleasure and contemplation”. Though for Steve, he found less pleasure and more disappointment than contemplation.  Both men returned to the States only to sleep on the floor and foster formidable enemies. Mark kicked out his co-founder, Eduardo Saverin, whereas Steve’s co-founder left the company on his own ticket. Unfortunately, Mark doesn’t have the protection of Steve’s charismatic personality. He’s a PR train wreck.

Following in Steve’s footsteps, Mark tried to diffuse the harsh light shed upon him by the bio-pic by appearing on Saturday Night Live with the actor who portrayed/betrayed him. Unfortunately, Mark lacked Steve’s control over the event. The largely improvised sketch merely cemented the film’s portrayl.
The Social Network’s composer, rebel-without-a-pause Trent Reznor, won the Oscar and the Golden Globe for the score. The digital virtuoso had this to say about Mark,
When I see the media heralding Zuckerburg, putting him up on a pedestal of genius and mentioned in the same breath as Steve Jobs, I highly disagree with that. He was in the right place, at the right time, with a functional tool.[8]
The one thing Mark has over Steve is a knack for social networking. Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn et cetera all know how to play nicely with one another. Old man Steve just doesn’t get it. Social networking involves alien concepts that Steve can’t quite grasp: community, altruism, gift economy, the non-rival good. He tried to create a social network called Ping for his iTune people to connect with each other. The oracle of social media, Mashable.com, says the clunky Ping “lives in a ghetto of its own. It doesn’t interact with other social networks at all, and that breaks one of the cardinal rules of social media if you ask us.”[9] It seems the open social concept grates on Steve’s closed up sociopathic sensibility. Steve tried to connect Ping with Facebook, but Mark pulled that plug soon after Steve announced Ping.[10] How embarrassing.
Steve invited Mark over for dinner in early October, 2010.[11] Perhaps there’s something these two can learn from one another. Whatever conversation transpired, they must have agreed to disagree on agreeable terms. When Mark heard that Steve was taking a medical leave in January, 2010, he posted on his Facebook with his iPhone, “Steve, you've done so much good for the world already. I hope you get better soon.” (150 people ‘liked” this). Nevertheless, Facebook maintains its distance from the lone wolf Ping.
At the Silicon Valley dinner with MacHead Obama, Mark sat on the President’s right hand side whilst Steve sat on his left. Steve was the only man not in a shirt and tie. Guess what he wore?

[1] Grossman, L. (2010, December 15) Person of The year: Mark Zuckerberg. Time Magazine.

[2] Diana, A. (2010, May 11) Facebook Deactivations Gaining Attention. Information Week.

[3] Carlson, C. (2010, March 5) At Last – The Full Story Of How Facebook was Founded. Business Insider. Retrieved from http://www.businessinsider.com/how-Facebook-was-founded-2010-3#we-can-talk-about-that-after-i-get-all-the-basic-functionality-up-tomorrow-night-1

[4] Frommer, D. (2010, September) Apple And Facebook Talked For More Than A Year -- Then Apple Launched Ping Without Facebook's Help. Business Insider. Retrieved from: http://www.businessinsider.com/apple-facebook-ping-2010-9#comment-4c992c097f8b9acb60a80700

[5] Matyszczyk, C. (2010, June 14) Facebook's Zuckerberg disses iPhone, removes post. cnet.com. Retrieved from http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-20007712-71.html

[6] Bertoni, S. (2010, September 22) Facebook’s Zuckerberg Now Richer Than Apple’s Steve Jobs [blog]. Money Talks. From Forbes.com. Retrieved from: http://blogs.forbes.com/stevenbertoni/2010/09/22/facebooks-zuckerberg-now-richer-than-apples-steve-jobs/

[7] Junior Achievement (2010) Latest Teen Idol: Steve Jobs. Retrieved from: http://www.ja.org/files/surveys/2010-Teens&EntrepreneurshipPart2.pdf

[8] Adams, S. (2010, October 11) Interview: Trent Reznor discusses The Social Network soundtrack. Drowned In Sound. Retrieved from: http://drownedinsound.com/in_depth/4141283-interview--trent-reznor-discusses-the-social-network-soundtrack

[9] Axon, S. (2010, October 16) Steve Jobs and Mark Zuckerberg Talked Ping Over Dinner. Mashable.com. Retrieved from: http://mashable.com/2010/10/16/steve-jobs-mark-zuckerberg/

[10] Swisher, K. (2010, September 2) Steve Jobs on Why Facebook Is Not Part of Apple’s New Ping Music Social Network: “Onerous Terms” [blog]. BoomTown. From AllThingsD. Retrieved from: http://kara.allthingsd.com/20100902/steve-jobs-on-why-Facebook-is-not-part-of-apples-new-ping-music-social-network-onerous-terms/

[11] Guynn, J. (2010, October 15) Apple's Steve Jobs pings Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg for dinner. Los Angeles Times.